Tuesday, February 14, 2012

Chris Brown and Bad Boys - How our media is failing women.

This Buzzfeed link has been circulating the web pretty constantly for the past 24 hours in the wake of musician and convicted felon Chris Brown performing at the Grammy Awards and going on to win the award for Best R&B Album. I can only hope that these women are joking, although that does nothing to dispel my ever growing belief that we’re screwing over women time and time again. I’m not okay with Chris Brown still having a career. I’m not okay with him being so quickly forgiven by the media industry for beating his girlfriend so badly that she was hospitalised (you can read the police report here, although I must warm you that it’s stomach churning). I’m not okay with the Grammys acting like victims here or the media treating Brown like some sort of redeemed hero in this entire mess, and neither should you be. I firmly believe that humans are inherently good and can move on from stuff like this to show how they’ve changed, although from what I’ve seen of Brown, he’s not exactly succeeding in that department.

It’s tough for me to nail down one thing about this entire mess that sickened me most. Where do you start on a case like this? However, the part I keep coming to time and time again, and the part that ties into the stuff I’ve written in regards to young adult fiction, is the complete lack of accountability coupled with the way our society has fetishized the bad boy to the point where we can overlook abhorrent misogyny and domestic violence. Let’s be very clear here: Chris Brown beat up a woman who was supposed to be able to trust him. There is nothing sexy or romantic about that photograph of Rihanna that was nigh on impossible to avoid for a long time after the event. I can’t believe I even have to say this but when girls and young women are proudly proclaiming that they’d let Chris Brown beat them, that they didn’t know what Rihanna was complaining about and that she was partially responsible for being beaten so badly that she was hospitalised, then I seriously fear what we’ve allowed to happen to women in this world.

The reason I’m bringing this up on The Book Lantern is because the justifications I have seen for Brown’s actions as well as the way we’ve allowed him to become a sex symbol hero are extremely similar to reactions I’ve seen in regard to YA bad boy love interests. I’m reminded of the frequent declarations I saw from Twilight fangirls who said they’d let Edward Cullen bruise them any day, something that takes on a much less sexy meaning given how often Bella is grabbed, pushed around and seriously injured throughout the series (and even if they're joking, which I hope they were, are they seriously thinking of the ramifications of what they've just said?) Even more problematic than this are the frequent justifications for Edward’s often troublesome behaviour, both from fans and characters within the novel. This is something taken to a book-thrown-against-a-wall extreme in Becca Fitzpatrick’s Hush Hush, where Patch’s harassment, stalking and threats of murder are downplayed to the extreme as the actions of a mere ‘bad boy’, the ‘anti-hero’ who is supposedly redeemed by his love of the heroine (don’t even get me started on that trope or we’ll be here forever), which never happens in that book anyway. Another male character’s disgusting attitudes towards a female character are justified because “he has a lot going on”. It’s far too common to pick up a young adult paranormal romance novel and find a designated love interest whose bad attitude and behaviour is passed off as charming or that of a bad boy, with his only truly appealing characteristic being that he’s attractive. Patch is a well-loved hero amongst a huge group of both young and older women readers, with fansites, book clubs, t-shirts and posters galore celebrating him. Why? At what point in our cultural evolution did it become okay to not just overlook the abhorrent and abusive behaviour of characters like this, but to fetishize it and place it as the romantic ideal?

Of course this is a question I can’t answer because it’s about more than young adult novels and Chris Brown. It’s about generations of treating women like 2nd class citizens, rape culture, misogyny, money, profit margins, sex, love, Planned Parenthood, skimpy dresses and pink versus blue. It took generations to make our culture the way it is and it’ll take a whole lot more to change things, yet changes are happening, slowly but surely. I’m sure we’ll get there eventually, even if it isn’t in my lifetime, because I have hope. But there are things we can do to change things now for the better, and one of those things would be to think about the consequences of what we do when we give a woman beater a pass because he’s famous or considered sexy. This isn’t something we can just ‘get over’, even if both Rihanna and Chris Brown have moved on, because this issue still matters. Our culture gave Roman Polanski Oscars and standing ovations despite him having drugged and raped a 13 year old girl and never being prosecuted for it. The same industry continually rewarded Charlie Sheen with money and employment despite his messy past which involved frequent threats towards women. From Heathcliff to Edward Cullen and Patch Cipriani, we’ve turned bad behaviour into something alluring, mysterious and sexy. Think about what this does to women and what it says to them. To worship and reward these male figures is essentially saying to women that they’re worth less than these men.

This world, this media and culture that won’t hold domestic abuse accountable and will put a guy who can sing and dance on a pedestal doesn’t give a flying monkey’s about those who were victimised. I’ve been told on more than one occasion that my analysis of YA’s attitude towards relationships and bad boys has been unfair, reading into things too much and nit-picking. I’ve been told that it’s just a fictional book for teenagers, nothing more, and the messages contained within shouldn’t be taken seriously. I’ve been told to get over it because they’re just books. I don’t accept that. Never have, never will. The more we ignore this trend and the more we try to justify it, the bigger the problem will get. It’ll grow so big that we don’t even notice it any more. How many women have to be hurt before a change happens? I’m not drawing some direct link between YA and domestic violence, that’s ridiculous and over-simplifies the real issue here, which is that our culture favours the big strong man throwing his weight around more than the woman he throws it onto. The handsome bad boy is not only untouchable, he’s the ideal. Authors have the right to write whatever they want to and they’re under absolutely no obligation to write anything other than what they want to. But I implore them to take a good long think about what it is they’re putting out there, especially when it’s marketed towards a young age group. Do you want to make these men your heroes? Do you want to perpetuate the idea that love hurts, that its foundations are formed on mistrust, attitude and submissiveness?

I hope those girls on twitter proudly declaring their love for Chris Brown and their desires to be beaten by him never ever have to go through what Rihanna went through. We don’t need to stand for this in any shape, way or form. The entertainment industry may not think so but women are worth something.

I leave you with this Women’s Aid advert featuring Keira Knightley on the topic of domestic abuse. This is a very distressing advert so please watch with caution. To those Chris Brown fangirls – do you think Knightley deserved that? Was she responsible for it? Do you think beatings are sexy now? Please think about this very seriously.



Donate to Women's Aid in England or for Scotland or donate to Womankind Worldwide. Further links to women's charities around the world and how to donate to them would be greatly appreciated in the comments section below.

Thursday, January 5, 2012

Heroine Tournament: Some Questions and Concerns

I'm sure some of you YA readers and book bloggers have likely come across the Twitter hashtag #HeroineTourney sometime in the past few weeks. The reason for it: the blog YA Sisterhood began a Heroine Tournament in November, and blog feedback led to the choosing of thirty-two heroines from various MG and YA series to "fight" against each other in a tournament to determine the strongest female character in the MG/YA market today. The successive weeks led to a narrowing of the field...and tomorrow marks the finale of the tournament. (For a full list of the heroines and the breakdown of the tournament rounds, visit this page.)

Now, I've been lazily following the Heroine Tournament over the past few weeks (through Twitter, the YA Sisterhood blog, and even some comments from friends), but I won't say that some things haven't bothered me ever since I first saw the main nominees for the tournament. (Here's some quick info: out of the thirty-two heroines, I've read or sampled the books in which twenty-seven of the thirty-two heroines are a part, so I'm not coming from a place of "I loved one book/two books/a handful of these books, so the rest of these heroines can suck it." I know many of these books and their heroines, so this post isn't from the view of someone with a lack of knowledge.) Here's one thing I noticed about many of these heroines: at least twenty-five of them are from YA series which feature a prominent romance as one of the main focuses of the story. (Examples: Bella Swan from Twilight, Rose Hathaway from the Vampire Academy series, Meghan Chase from The Iron Fey series, etc.) Coincidence? I wondered.

My suspicions, of course, blew up a bit yesterday when I saw that Tessa Gray of The Infernal Devices series won out against Katniss Everdeen of The Hunger Games trilogy. I'll be honest in saying that the outcome left me scratching my head a bit. When I read various opinions of Katniss, I hear many passionate things: people either love her prickly, distant characterization or hate her for the exact same reason. But when I read reader opinions about Tessa Gray, what often comes up first? Do I hear about her quiet strength or her sensibility? Do I hear these readers passionately speak of their love for her as a character? No. Sure, the readers will be passionate...but not about Tessa. I often first hear about Will and Jem and how lucky she is to have two such great guys in love with her.

Er. Right. Why should boys (or, in this case, male love interests) figure at all into a heroine tournament? Men should never define women, but I also find it disheartening when romance defines a woman. I can't say it doesn't bother me that talk of many of these Heroine Tournament girls often doesn't lead to praise about their characterization or strength...but their significant others.

Thus, I must ask this question: did this tournament advocate strong female characters? Or did it, at the end of the day, only succeed in pushing heroines whose romances were often deemed "most important" to their individual journeys?

Keep in mind: the outcome of this tournament was reader/voter-determined. So where is the problem? Is this the problem of the authors who write heroines whose love lives figure so greatly into their characterization and stories, or the readers for endorsing females whose greatest trait is often which boy is on her arm? There's nothing wrong with romance or its place in novels...but, when a heroine's most defining characteristic to many readers is a relationship or her romantic entanglements, something is very, very wrong.

These are just some things I think YA readers should consider when it comes to "strong" female characters and the representations of feminism (or, perhaps in this case, "pseudo-feminism") within the books they read.

Tuesday, January 3, 2012

How To Make A Basic Book Cover

Click Here for Full Sized Image

Friday, December 16, 2011

Highlights of the Year: How did Shine become Chime?

This was a big year for YA. Actually, many years were big for YA, but I cannot in good memory recall a time when there were so many storms in a teacup surrounding one genre. One of these events started this blog, and since we didn’t have a time to give our readers a front row view of everything, we’re taking this opportunity to highlight some of the events this year.

On October the twelfth, the finalists for the National Book Award were announced, and the YA category boasted some fine titles. Later, however, a sixth book was added to the list, Franny Billingsley’s “Chime”. It turned out that it was the original contender, and the book that was announced in its place, Lauren Myracle’s “Shine”, was shortlisted because of miscommunication, but the judges had decided to have six finalists instead of five because of the book’s merits. And then, a few days later, Myracle was asked to withdraw in order to “preserve the integrity of the award and the judges’ work”, a request she complied with.

Lauren Myracle: “How I Was Un-Nominated For the National Book Award”: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lauren-myracle/lauren-myracle-national-book-awards_b_1019972.html

What did the interwebs think about that? Here are two pieces, one by YA author Libba Bray ( http://libba-bray.livejournal.com/62266.html) and the other by Isak (http://isak.typepad.com/isak/2011/10/shine-on-the-unbelievable-treatment-of-lauren-myracle.html).

My opinion, when first hearing about this was: “Who cares for how many nominees there are, when there is only one winner?” Truly, the words of someone who isn’t fully aware of the implications. Within a few hours of browsing various articles, I realized that apparently things are more complicated.

But hey, the NBF decided to donate to a charity, didn’t it? Surely some good came out of the whole thing.

Well…

No. I don’t think so.

This situation wasn’t about the money, money, money (Jessie J or ABBA, take your pick), nor was it about some shiny sticker on the front cover. Anyone reading Myracle’s account can see how deeply this whole ordeal affected her, but I don’t think people understood what exactly this kind of thing might mean to an author.

Here’s how I see writing: It’s a lonesome, difficult work, without much visible recognition or reward (NOT monetary reward, for anyone about to quote Cyn Balog). Ask anyone who wrote or attempted to write how many hours they put into it, and they won’t be able to tell you because it is just that overcompassing. You spend months, years of your life, planning, reading, writing, researching, rewriting, looking for representation, rewriting some more, fighting with your editor, and then with your copyeditor. You do all this not knowing for sure if any of your hard work will pay off, and if anyone at all will deign to leaf through your book

Even with publication, an author’s work isn’t over. They have to promote, tour, write a better second book, somehow deal with negative reviews. They do it with grace and patience because that’s just how it is and you have to accept that not everyone will love what you do. But it doesn’t matter, because any real acknowledgement, like an email of thanks from a grateful reader or a nice review, makes the whole thing worthwhile.

To be nominated for the National Book Award isn’t just your book gaining critical acclaim, but also having your hard work being noticed and appreciated. The debate wasn’t about whether Shine deserved to be part of the nominee list, or even whether rules needed to be bend to allow for one more finalist in a group of five.

It’s about acknowledging the work of an author. It’s about noticing a book and giving it its due credit. It’s about an author being humiliated because apparently a human mistake could not be tolerated.

In that context, the resolution (the NBF donating to a charity specifically orientating to stopping hate crimes) is satisfactory.

But it doesn’t make the NBF look any better. No matter what they think on the matter:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QSe12cy7UT8
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...